Watch family · Style & purpose
Waterproof (Water-Resistant) Watches
Partially verifiedWatches with a case sealed against water and dust ingress by gasketed crown, case back and crystal, a wristwatch-era construction problem with no close pocket-watch equivalent since a pocket watch is not normally exposed to water in use.
Movement & mechanism
- Screw-down or gasketed case back sealing the movement compartment
- Screw-down or gasketed crown, sometimes with a secondary locking system
- Gasketed crystal seal, in addition to the case-back and crown seals
Identification
- Case back or dial marked 'waterproof' or with a specific water-resistance rating
- Screw-down crown, often with a protective guard
- Thicker case profile than an equivalent non-sealed watch, to accommodate gaskets
Terminology
- Gasket — a sealing ring, typically of rubber or synthetic material, preventing water ingress at a case joint
- Water resistance rating — a depth or pressure figure indicating tested sealing performance
Known variations
- Screw-back waterproof watch
- Waterproof watch without a dedicated depth rating
- Early hermetically sealed 'oyster'-type case designs
Pocket-watch ancestry
Waterproofing addresses a problem specific to the wristwatch's constant, exposed wear on the body rather than a pocket-watch practice being carried over; it drew on general case-sealing and gasket engineering rather than on any established pocket-watch waterproofing tradition, since pocket watches were carried in a pocket and not routinely exposed to water.
Collecting notes
An important precursor category to dive watches, collected for early sealed-case patents and construction as a milestone in wristwatch case engineering.
Related photographs


No confidently matched photograph of this subject has been found yet. These photographs show a closely related record, and are not examples of the type described on this page.
Sources & references
- General literature on early waterproof wristwatch case patents; individual patent priority requires further research.
Where sources disagree, the disagreement is stated rather than resolved silently.