Grande complication pocket watch · France
Breguet No. 160 'Marie-Antoinette'
Partially verifiedReportedly commissioned by an admirer of Marie-Antoinette with instructions to use gold wherever possible and to include every complication then known, though the details and even the identity of the commissioner are recorded through secondary Breguet-company tradition rather than a surviving original commission letter, and should be treated with appropriate caution.
Technical facts
- Complications
- Perpetual calendar, minute repeater, equation of time, power reserve, thermometer, among others
- Case
- Gold, per the reported original brief to use gold wherever technically possible
- A replica
- Breguet (the modern company) produced a reconstruction, sometimes displayed alongside discussion of the original — researchers should be careful to distinguish the original No. 160 from the modern replica in photographs and museum labels
Historical significance
- Reportedly commissioned by an admirer of Marie-Antoinette with instructions to use gold wherever possible and to include every complication then known, though the details and even the identity of the commissioner are recorded through secondary Breguet-company tradition rather than a surviving original commission letter, and should be treated with appropriate caution.
- Took decades to complete and was finished only after Breguet's death by his son and successors.
- Stolen from the L. A. Mayer Museum for Islamic Art, Jerusalem, in 1983 and recovered in 2007; the theft and recovery are themselves well-documented and important provenance events for the object.
Photographs

Photographs are illustrative examples of the type, not necessarily the exact object described. Verify details against the source file page.
Sources & references
- L. A. Mayer Museum for Islamic Art, published provenance and theft/recovery history
- Breguet company, published historical materials (commissioning legend treated as company tradition, not independently documented)
Where sources disagree, the disagreement is stated rather than resolved silently.